Joseph Lawler
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Notes
  • Disclosure

Eating high-fat

3/8/2019

0 Comments

 
Last year, I experimented with eating keto/low-carb, high-fat.

I became curious about it after a family member told me he lost a lot of weight with the diet, and after I listened to Nina Teicholz’ appearance on the Joe Rogan podcast. I wasn’t looking to lose weight, but rather was intrigued and open to a little self-experimentation.

Over the course of a few weeks, I ramped down my carbs by cutting back on deserts, bread, etc. Then, I went full keto for two weeks, adding fat to my diet and almost totally eliminating carbs. After that, I reintroduced some carbs back to my diet, but sparingly.

Here’s what I found:

  1. I lost fat very rapidly.

Just a week or two into keto, I lost enough fat that I had to order new belts. I had not previously been "fat" by any standard. But I lost fat I didn’t know I had.

2.  I stopped experiencing cravings.

While eating low-carb, I stopped experiencing cravings for food. I would eventually start to get hungry if a long time went between meals, but in a way that did not make me feel unhappy or desperate.

3. I could go without food no problem.

I could, and did, easily go days at a time without eating while eating LCHF. Before, I would struggle to get through a day at work without packing myself a snack like a protein bar for the afternoon. But while on LCHF, I could power through a whole day and not even really think about food. The only exception was if I worked out — in that case, I would get hungry enough to need food.

4. I stopped thinking about food.

Food stopped being a preoccupation. I enjoyed the meals that I had, but I didn’t think about food unnecessarily. The thought of breaking from work, for instance, to find a snack never really crossed my mind.

5. I felt less brain fog

I rarely, if ever, felt brain fog or torpidity while on the LCHF diet, a welcome change.

6. It didn’t make me weaker.

I maintained my regular lifting routine while on the diet and didn’t notice any drop-off in progress.

7. It is sustainable.

I only quit LCHF, months after I started it, by making a conscious decision to feed myself more carbs. I wasn’t having any trouble maintaining it.

I found that the diet, when combined with a moderate amount of exercise at least, could include enough carbs to live a normal lifestyle and still get the benefits of the LCHF diet enumerated above. For instance, moderate sides of grains with dinner, bread, and occasional desserts all work within the diet/lifestyle. Some things are always off-limits, such as soda, but you will never miss them. 

The most difficult part of maintaining the lifestyle is the logistics. High-carb, high-sugar foods are just much more accessible. But the fact that you don’t need any snacks makes it much easier to cope.

There is absolutely no need to eat weird foods, count calories, or follow strict guidelines, as I’m seeing some people do to follow misguided keto advice. Just load up on meat, eggs, cheese, vegetables, etc. — eat all you want, that’s the entire point of the diet.

Some social events become tricky if you’re trying to avoid carbs, but even that is manageable. As for drinking, in my case, I love drinking whisky and was happy to give up beer in favor of more bourbon, Irish whiskey, etc.

8. It makes you realize you are addicted to sugar and carbs.

Having been re-sensitized, I now am shocked at the sweetness of some foods and drinks. I’ll never drink soda again -- it just tastes way too sweet, unpleasantly sweet and harshly acidic. 

I’m also now aware of how often people interrupt themselves and break their concentration to seek out processed foods and sweets, often while visibly struggling with their own self-control and feeling miserable. I hadn't previously noticed. I used to be the same way -- I used to be unable to concentrate on what was in front of me because I was wondering whether it would make me feel better to walk down the hall and grab a twix or whatever. Those kinds of temptations simply didn’t cross my mind when I was eating low-fact, high-carb.
0 Comments

Alienated America: Why Some Places Thrive While Others Collapse, by Tim Carney

3/5/2019

0 Comments

 
Alienated America is Tim Carney’s collation of Alexis de Tocqueville, Charles Murray, W. Bradford Wilcox, David Autor, and his own reporting in bars, diners, and places of worship throughout the U.S.

The central theme is that social cohesion and economic well-being are together on one end of a spectrum of which the other end is alienation and isolation. Drawing on social science and his own reporting, Carney concludes that all good things go together with civil society -- the institutions that existing between the individual and the family and the government, such as unions, sports teams, recreational groups, and, above all, churches. Apart from civil society, you have the opposite of flourishing: Unemployment, distrust, resentment, drug use, and suicide.

By thinly slicing voting data from the 2015-2016 GOP primary, Carney concludes that it is the people who have lost strong civil society who were President Trump’s earliest and strongest supporters. Republicans in economically strong areas weren’t interested in Trump, and Republicans in tight-knit, church-going communities, such as Dutch Wisconsin, weren’t either. But to voters with neither material prosperity nor strong civil society, Trump’s pessimistic rhetoric, his call to make America great again, sounded compelling.

How did a significant chunk of the country end up so alienated and ready to turn to Trump? Carney, a staunch conservative, places some of the blame on the government. He argues that government is necessarily in tension with civil society, and that government services cannot substitute for human ties created in a church community -- and that, in some cases, the government services meant to liberate poor or dependent groups may actually deprive them of human ties.

Yet liberal-leaning readers skeptical of that conservative narrative should read on to the second half of the book, in which Carney also blames big finance, big business, and a general libertarian-tinged atmosphere of individualism for the rise of alienation. He says that big business, aided by big government, has had a homogenizing effect on the country, making it harder for local institutions and ways of life to thrive.

He notes, for instance, that the rise of contingent work, such as driving for Uber or contracting for Amazon, has made us materially richer but has also weakened the human ties we used to make via the workplace, threatening to stratify and dehumanize the economy.

​
In his conversations with voters, Carney says, he’s found that some of Trump’s strongest supporters are veterans, former cops, and laid-off union workers -- all people who once worked in ultra-cohesive units, in which they relied on each other for their livelihoods or lives, and then lost it. Forced then to acclimate to a hyper-individualistic society in which people’s relationships with each other are largely contingent, those vets, cops, and union workers have a difficult time adjusting.
​

Overall, Alienated America is a convincing portrait not only of the factors that led to the rise of Trump, but also of some of the most serious problems with our country, which the past three years have shown we are only just now learning how to discuss, thanks to the efforts of people like Carney. Maybe in another three years, his next book will help show the way out.
0 Comments

    Archives

    October 2020
    August 2020
    May 2020
    February 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    June 2019
    March 2019
    October 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    December 2017
    May 2017
    December 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    March 2016
    June 2015
    February 2015
    August 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    October 2013

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.